1. (Source: idealcat, via genettagenetta)

  2. likeafieldmouse:

    Brett Amory - More from the series Waiting (2012-13)


  3. cubrone:



    dating an identical twin scares me bc what if i get them confused

    i read a book once where this girl was romantically involved with this guy who had a twin and they would punk her all the time and be like which one is your boyfriend you have to kiss the right one and then it turned out one of them was evil and trapped her in a dungeon with a bunch of rats or some shit

    but that’s like, worst case scenario

    Holy shit, that book was a huge part of my childhood. Or, prepubescent years, rather. And they were identical triplets. Ah, good times.

    (via ruinedchildhood)

  4. jj-wilde:


    girl gangs make me swoon so hard

    So fab

    (Source: johnthecraftist, via ognob)

  5. dappledwithshadow:

    The Absinthe Drinkers, Edvard Munch


    (via cardstumble)

  6. davidcaolo:

    One perfect shot: The Twilight Zone, S01E11, “And When The Sky Was Opened.” 

    I struggled with this one, as most of the episode features a man in a hospital bed. However, Col. Forbes eventually returns to the bar that’s usually full of his companions, only to find it empty. The high angle, strong shadows and stacked furniture do a lot to emphasize Forbes’ failing grip on reality.

    I’m posting one definitive shot from each episode of The Twilight Zone, once per day.

  8. silentstormshadow:

    Alexander McQueen - “SAVAGE BEAUTY” {Exhibition} #2

    (via venomousswan)


  9. davidcrake:

    *Spider-Man throws Gwen out the window, catches her with web, jerks her spine a little* FORESHADOWING #Scotchblogging

    How dare you, sir.

  10. davidcrake:

    Why would Connors record himself taking the reptile DNA, and then immediately knock the camera over?

    Also, where are all these tropical lizards coming from in Manhattan?

    Why would I put a hat on if my best friend just got blown up in front of me?
  11. (Source: oscarwetnwilde)

  12. davidcrake:



    Well good morning Jenny Lewis! Do you think they make that suit in a men’s size?

    "Just One of the Guys" // Jenny Lewis // 2014

    Kristen Stewart & Brie Larson & Anne Hathaway. Mega babe swooonnnnnn. Stewart is the best dude :333

    Wait, what? New Jenny Lewis stuff?!

    Oh my god, Kristen as a man looks like Jared Leto. Who is the drummer?
  13. alliartist:





    Meet the Man Who Transforms Corpses into Diamonds

    Rinaldo Willy’s job is to transform dead people into precious stones. 

    Willy, 33, is the founder and CEO of Algordanza, a peculiar funeral home based in the lovely town of Domat/Ems in western Switzerland. Algordanza—which in the local Romansch language means “remembrance”—is one of the leaders in the production of so called “memorial diamonds.” If you fancy a blinged-out eternal sleep, Algordanza will put the latest technologies at your service to convert your ashes into a synthetic diamond. 

    The price for this transfiguration ranges between 4,500 and 20,000 Swiss francs ($5,000-$22,000), depending on how big a diamond you want to become. That includes the packaging of your shiny remains into what the firm’s website describes as a “noble wooden box.” But it will then be up to your loved ones to decide whether to leave you in your noble box or put you on a ring or pendant so they can carry you around with them. 

    Every year, 850 former-people enter Algordanza’s laboratory to emerge some years later as a precious gem. While shortage of land and increasing population are calling the traditional cemetery model into question, perhaps the future of corpse management could lie in this unusual blend of mortuary science and jewelry. 

    To further investigate, I caught up with the man himself, Rinaldo Willy.

    So, can you tell us how you got the idea of making diamonds from corpses?

    The idea first struck meten years ago, when I was a student of economics. One of my teachers gave me an article by a Russian scientist to read; it was about the production of synthetic diamonds to be used in the semiconductor industry. The article explained how such diamonds could be made from ashes, and I misinterpreted it, thinking it was referring to human ashes–while in fact it was talking about vegetable ashes. 

    I liked the idea, and I asked my teacher for more information on that process of transforming human ashes into diamonds. He quickly told me that I had got the whole thing wrong. But he found that my mistake was quite intriguing, so he got in touch with the author of the article, who just happened to have some diamond-making machines here in Switzerland. Together, we started to set up what would become Algordanza.

    What was so compelling about turning human ashes into diamonds?

    Diamonds are precious, pure, clean. They couldn’t be more different from today’s cemeteries, which are places crammed with too many graves, very often neglected, and where you can’t have a real relationship with the dead. I loved the idea of dead people becoming something you can touch and enjoy the sight of. I also like the fact that a diamond remains, can be kept and passed down from generation to generation. It’s not something that you just scatter away at some point, like sometimes happens with ashes from cremation. 

    In other words, you think that “diamonds are forever.” 

    I don’t want to use that term, since “forever” recalls the concept of eternity, which belongs to the Church’s terminology. We prefer the word “unzerbrechlich,” which in German means “indestructible.” Our diamonds are indestructible tools of remembrance, but, at the end of the day, it depends on a person’s loved ones to keep their memory alive. 

    Let’s get a bit technical. What is the procedure to transform human ashes into a synthetic diamond?

    The whole process takes place here in Switzerland. After a person is cremated, we receive their ashes; according to the legislation of the country the dead person is from, we either receive the ashes in a single urn or in two urns shipped at two different times to avoid the situation where, in case of accident, all the ashes are lost.

    We treat the ashes with particular chemical agents to extract all the carbon from them. Next, carbon is heated to high temperatures and converted into graphite. Finally, we place the graphite in a machine that essentially reproduces the conditions that are given in the depths of the Earth, where natural diamonds form over thousands of years: extremely high pressure and temperatures around 1500 degrees Celsius. After some weeks, or months, we obtain the diamond.

    How big are the diamonds that you can create in your laboratory?

    Usually they are four carats when they are rough and 1 carat after they’ve been cut. There have been diamonds as big as 1.6 or 1.8 carats, but they were exceptional cases. 

    Why do some people become bigger diamonds than others?

    In general, the dimension of the diamond depends on how long you keep the graphite in the machine: the longer the process, the bigger the diamond. But it also depends on the quality of the ashes. For example, if a person used to wear dentures, or a prosthesis, or they used to take certain medicines, their ashes would be less pure and the quality of the diamond would be inferior. 

    Such things can also influence the color of the stone. For example, people who have been treated with chemotherapy usually wind up being diamonds of lighter colors. But we still don’t know what determines the color of the gem: our diamonds are usually blue because of the presence of boron traces in human body, but every person changes into a different and unique diamond, ranging from crystal-clear to almost black. 

    What’s the difference between one of your diamonds and a real diamond?

    Our diamonds are real diamonds. They have all the physical and chemical properties of diamonds. Obviously, synthetic diamonds are less valuable than natural ones, since they’re man-made. But you can’t tell our diamonds from natural ones with the naked eye. Not even a jeweler could. The only one way to distinguish between them is a chemical screening – a gemologist may help you with that –which will find out that the stone was made artificially. 

    So hypothetically, nobody but gemologists could guess that the diamond ring I am wearing is actually, say, my late fiancée? 

    There’s no apparent difference. It would most likely look like a natural blue diamond, which costs in the neighborhood of $40,000.

    Don’t you think that it may give rise to a new fashion of “body snatching”? I mean thieves, who aren’t usually very knowledgeable about gemological screenings, could take my diamond in the belief that they’re just stealing a precious stone, when in fact they’re snatching my grandpa.  

    Natural diamonds always go with a certificate proving their authenticity; therefore it could be difficult for a thief to resell our diamonds. But the possibility of this kind of theft does exist, since more or less 80 percent of our costumers treat their memorial diamonds as jewels, often mounting them on rings. 

    And indeed, a similar case has happened some time ago in Germany: police called us after finding one of our diamonds in a thief’s hideout, together with jewels, money and stolen TVs. Luckily, in that case the diamond had a laser inscription—which we provide at an extra cost—and the police could get in touch with us. 

    Is it possible to make more than one diamond from the same person, in order to avoid a scenario in which you lose the diamond, thereby losing your dead relative forever?

    Yes, it is possible, since just two grams of carbon are sufficient to produce a diamond. In fact, some of our customers, especially in Japan, ask to make many memorial diamonds from the same ashes, one for each member of the family. Theoretically, and depending on the quantity and quality of the ashes, we could churn out up to 50 diamonds for every person; practically, the best we’ve done so far is nine diamonds. 

    How big are you in Japan?

    We are huge in Japan. It accounts for 25 percent of our sales. I think that it’s mainly for two reasons: in the first place, they have a much stronger cult of ancestors than we have in Europe; they have a very close relationship with their dead. Secondly, it’s a question of numbers: more than 99 percent of Japanese people are cremated after death. That means that there are many more ashes to be transformed into diamonds. 

    In general, why do people resorting to your services decide to be transformed into diamonds?

    In many cases they don’t decide, since it’s their relatives—usually their mothers or wives—who come to us. The reason given by the relatives is typically that they want to keep the deceased always with them. But there are also people who choose to become diamonds while they are still alive. Often they are people who are aware that they’ll die soon, like for example someone with a terminal illness. 

    One of the reasons they give us is economic—they want to avoid the costs of burial in a cemetery. In other cases, they’re people living alone and very far from the place where they were born, who are afraid that nobody would properly care for their grave if they were buried.

    Are you going to become a diamond, too?

    I don’t know. Hopefully it will be up to my relatives, to my wife and children, to decide whether I will. They’re the ones who will have to choose the best way to cope with the grief and loss.


    If I don’t manage to transform into an immortal Vampire Witch Queen, this is what I want done with my remains. Then I want the resulting gem set into the most ornate gothy-goth pendant possible ("it needs more bats!"), and passed down through the years as an important goth heirloom. 

    When my lover dies, I’m turning him into a pretty pendant. But keeping his skull. He says he’ll do the same with me

    i would like for myself and every member of my family to be made into diamonds and set into a crown, growing ever more elaborate as time goes on.

    I am very into this. I want to a diamond when I die.

  14. Copyright 2014 Ryan Putnam
    Copyright 2014 Ryan Putnam
    Copyright 2014 Ryan Putnam

  15. There’s been a campaign going around with the hashtag “stopcensoringmotherhood”. Basically a bunch of mothers on Instagram have been led to believe that their accounts are being suspended because they have posted photos of themselves breast feeding their children.

    This campaign/petition was started by a women, who’s blog is titled “Amerikaw!” The sad thing is, she has horribly mislead her followers. The reason her account was suspended was because she posted NUDE photos of her young child. Nudity is very clearly against Instagram’s terms of service. It has NOTHING TO DO WITH MOTHERHOOD OR BREASTFEEDING.

    Even before Amerikaw started this petition, there were MANY mothers “fighting for their right” to post nude photos of their children (with the hashtag “stopsexualizingchildren”). That is what this is about. That is why accounts are being suspended and deleted. IG has every right to delete these accounts.

    The most important factor in all of this is the fact that these parents are making it incredibly easy for the children to become victims. The law does not consider child pornography (even in the form of “innocent” photos) to be a victimless crime. No one is saying naked child photos are inherently sexual. The problem is, there ARE people in this world who DO consider it so. As horrifying as that thought is, it is reality. IG is not sexualizing your child. They are helping making it more difficult for pedophiles to add your kid’s image to their library and sharing it with others.

    Naked photos of your child do NOT belong on the Internet. Stop thinking about yourself, your “rights” as their parent to post whatever you want. It’s not about you. It’s about your CHILD and the fact that their parents, the people who should want to protect them more than anyone else, are allowing some sick people easy access to their image. But these people are too selfish to realize that it’s not about their freedom of social media, it’s about their child’s privacy. Of which they apparently have zero concern.

    So if you come across these hashtags on IG, know that IG is NOT suspending accounts because of breastfeeding (might as well call it a fucking red harring). It’s because they have posted photos of naked children. Innocent though they may be, it is 1) A clear violation of rules and 2) an extreme lack of respect and privacy for the children in these photos.

    Oh, and for the parents using the argument “I see naked adults on Instagram!” 1) REPORT IT. As made obvious, it is a violation of the rules! And 2) Why can you not see that an adult choosing to post nude photos of themselves on the Internet is much different than an innocent child having their naked bodies forever put on the Internet without any kind of consent or understanding of consequences?